FN cuatro. The fresh Board renders zero assertion within desire you to management mandate is not the right solution nor your independent wisdom take to try inapplicable. We manage notice, yet not, that a couple standards from comment wherein a go court feedback a management agency’s findings, brand new reasonable evidence ensure that you the brand new independent wisdom try, question precisely the overview of factual results. (Strumsky v. Hillcrest Condition Team Old-age Assn. (1974) eleven Cal. three dimensional twenty-eight, 44-forty five [112 Cal. 805, 520 P.2d 29].) The range regarding remark doesn’t affect breakdown of management determinations which are not truthful findings. (Zink v. City of Sausalito (1977) 70 Cal. Application. three-dimensional 662, 665 [139 Cal. 59].) Where, just like the right here, the information commonly during the argument, it is irrelevant towards the effect perhaps the large facts or new separate view decide to try is applicable.

FN 5. The term “residence” are a term without specified meaning, fundamentally demanding construction regarding this statute otherwise goal where its employed. (Find in re also Morelli (1970) 11 Cal. Software. three dimensional 819, 830 [91 Cal. 72].) It is frequently said to be similar to “domicile.” (Select Elec. Password, 200, subd. (a);Burt v. Scarborough (1961) 56 Cal. 2d 817, 820 [17 Cal. 146, 366 P.2d 498] (construing “residence” getting location objectives).) In the event the word “residence” are qualified by eg terms and conditions because “actual” or “genuine,” its used in a feeling that will prevent one of installing more than one residence, plus the quarters ought to be the principal host to home. (See the regulators discussed supra, and you can seeBurt v. 2d within p. 820.)